Queer + Peculiar Craft | The Clemente
Currently on view at The Clemente in the Lower East Side is Queer + Peculiar Craft, an exhibition of contemporary ceramics and textiles that examines identity and challenges viewers' expectations of craft.
Curated by Andrew Cornell Robinson, the exhibit showcases “an inter-sectional group of artists who explore craft to transgress expectations of traditional materials, methods, and meaning,” according to the show’s press release. The show features a diverse selection of subversive work that includes pottery, quilting, cross-stitching, printmaking, and crochet employed in unconventional and refreshing ways.
One artist featured in the show, Koren Christofides, explores feminism through ceramics. In an email, Robinson explained that some of Christofides' works are soft sculptures made with industrial ceramic fiber insulation covered in paper clay, resulting in pieces that are simultaneously “familiar and strange.” For his prismatic quilts featuring erotic males nudes, Greg Climer reinterprets traditional quilt-making methods by “creating the fabric fragments rather than upcycling scraps,” according to the exhibition essay.
Phoenix Lindsey-Hall’s ceramic sculptures play with “repetition and formalism,” according to Robinson. “It uses that formalism to include queer stories within the framework of contemporary aesthetics.” Her Fourteen Blows features a row of white porcelain claw hammers—a weapon used in hate crimes against members of the LGBTQ community—protruding limply from a wall.
Robinson’s own ceramic and mixed media sculptures included in the show “explore historical customs as a metaphor for queer-baiting and conformity.” The sculptures in his Jamon Jamon series reference a medieval Spanish custom in which hosts offered ham to visitors to “sniff out heresy during the inquisition when the pious were looking for expressions of distaste in response to the offer of sliced pork,” the exhibit essay explains. His Jamon Jamon sculptures are a “metaphor about being ‘suspected’ and ‘queer-baited’ as a gay man."
Inspiration for Queer + Peculiar Craft came from a 1993 interview with the late artist Felix Gonzalez-Torres for A.R.T. Press. When asked about the lack of “overt political or Latino content” in his work, Gonzalez-Torres responded:
“I’m not a good token. I don’t wear the right colors. I have my own agenda. Some people want to promote multiculturalism as long as they are the promoters, the circus directors. We have an assigned role that’s very specific, very limited….”
“[Gonzalez-Torres] expressed an impatience that I could identity with as a gay man making art,” Robinson noted. “I felt empowered by his question, ‘Who is going to define my culture?’”
Interview with Andrew Robinson
written by Beatrice Helman Issue 8 was curated by Shannon Goff and Roxanne Jackson.
"I understand the draw of the sentimental, the nostalgic. I see it in my grandmother’s Stangl plate that held my buttered toast for breakfast. I love the sense of touch and connection to the maker. Looking at or if you are lucky enough to hold a polychrome pot by Nampeyo, and feel the pinched clay on the interior of one of her seed jars, and realize that it was her hands that made that nearly one hundred years ago."
Today on Maake we talk with Andrew Robinson @acrstudio about his work, how the introduction of clay changed his life, revising stories from his family history, the role of drawing in this practice, and so much more.
Hi Andrew! Thank you so much for taking the time to talk to us. Let’s start off with the basics —where did you grow up and does that experience appear in your work, whether consciously or subconsciously?
I was born in Camden, New Jersey, a small industrial town neighboring Philadelphia. I grew up with my time split between the suburbs of New York City and Sergeantsville a small farming community where my grandmother raised soy and kept an apple orchard. Growing up in the 1970s and 80s in New Jersey there was a lot of time to run wild, especially in the rural parts of Hunterdon County where my siblings and I spent some of our free time with our father after my parents’ divorce. It seemed like a vacation, to run amok through corn fields and woods, learning to swim in creeks and canals, even when our days were filled with chores, being outside felt good. Making is something that my family valued. There was an interest in tinkering and DIY. My mother was an abstract painter who had studied under Hans Hoffman and Tony Smith. My dad was a writer and teacher for a time. I was surrounded by art and books. So, a life in the creative arts seemed normal to me. I suppose if anything I bring an intuitive impulse to making and a connection to the memory of lived experiences from the places I come from and carry that with me where ever I go.
You mentioned having loved Rock and Roll growing up and I was wondering if you could identify the aspects that attracted you, and where it led you? It seems like an entryway into the world of music, art, and intense creation.
As a teenager I spent time hanging out with garage bands and basement jam sessions listening to friends playing, and mixing tapes and collecting albums at the local record shop. I played bass and sang, thinking I could be Lou Reed or David Bowie someday but alas I was more interested in listening to music while I made pots. My tastes are pretty eclectic, so I found myself attracted to everyone from Led Zeppelin to Gang of Four to the No Wave and Punk scenes in the east village of New York City. There is something wonderful and radical about rock-n-roll. It is iconoclastic by nature, and that appeals to me.
What was your first interaction with clay?
I was not a particularly good student. Dyslexia was a perplexing stumbling block for me early in my life, and I didn’t talk so much as a little kid so the teachers didn’t know quite what to do with me. My third-grade teacher handed me a block of clay and put me in a corner while the rest of the class did a reading lesson. I’m pretty sure she thought I was retarded. Putting my hands in clay at that moment seemed so intuitive to me. I modeled some figures and I guess the teachers thought it was pretty good. That fall I was transferred into a learning through the arts program funded by the Guggenheim Museum. I had to endure a ride on the short-bus every morning with a group of misfit children. But each day we had art, and were exposed to artists who would come out from the city to work with us. I started developing my own black and white photographs then with the help of a visiting photographer who had built a dark room in our classroom. Around that time, I met Grace, a local potter and a member of my church. She took me under her wing. So, after school most days I was working in her pottery mixing glazes, mopping floors, wedging clay and learning how to throw pots on a Soldner kick wheel. I worked with her for eight years to the age of eighteen before I went off to study ceramics and sculpture.
Were you always a kid who liked to make stuff, or did that develop as you got older?
Working with my hands comes easily to me. There is always more to learn, I stay curious and new materials and tools are usually greeted as a happy challenge. At the age of ten I built my first Raku kiln. It was pretty primitive, but I learned how to build the fire-brickwork to distribute the flames and heat around the kiln interior. I am fascinated to uncover how things work, or how to coax them into working better. I feel lucky to have grown up at a time when shop-class was still a thing in American public schools.
How do you work through moments where you feel out of sync with your work or are unsure about where to go next?
Oh, I do hate those moments of doubt when faced with the proverbial blank canvas. I am generally a restless person, so sitting still in the neurotic arm chair in my studio usually doesn’t last too long. I find that I have to mop the floor or wedge the clay or walk the dog. When I am doing something, it usually leads to something. A walk in the woods is always a good idea.
Can you talk about how you entered the world of ceramics, and the pros and cons of a formal education versus the knowledge you gained as an apprentice?
In my apprenticeship, I learned about getting things done on a task list. I learned about trial and error. I worked for a production potter so making useful things was the goal and I learned a great deal from that experience, including the value of working through a problem with my hands. After my apprenticeship I thought I would join the Navy and become a welder. That seemed like a good option for me as my grades were not spectacular, and the lingering dyslexia and flirtations with adolescent delinquency continued to slow my progress, so my options for college seemed dim. As fate would have it, my portfolio got me into art school, where I could also learn to weld. It seemed like a better option for me than the Navy at the time. Besides I don’t do well with authority figures. That said, I found my formal education in a ceramics program at the Maryland Institute College of Art and the Glasgow School of Art in Scotland to be invaluable. I thrived in art school surrounded by teachers and peers who seemed to love what they were doing and brought an infectious enthusiasm to the studio each day. I really have no regrets about my years studying ceramics and sculpture. Of course, back then an education was financially more accessible for those without means. I got some Pell grants and pursued my MFA from the School of Visual Arts which was a very different experience from studying for my undergraduate degree. The art world of New York City was a different place entirely, it seemed terrifically competitive and exhausting at times. I almost dropped out after my first semester. I had found that while my craft education had prepared me well to make pretty much anything; I was not as prepared for discussions about post-modernism art theories, which were all the rage back then. I felt out of my depth with Michel Foucault, Jacques Derrida, and discussions about semiotics. The English translations of their writing felt ham-fisted to me. It is sort of ironic that I ended up on the board of the Foucault Society years later.
Thankfully I met Tommy Lanigan Schmidt a spry and savvy artist and professor who seemed to read between the lines of my work. He turned me on to queer artists like Susan Sontag, Jack Smith, Robert Gober, Leigh Bowery and transgressive “camp” explorations of art and politics by folks like Annie Sprinkle, Gran Fury and General Idea. Graduate school gave me an opportunity to explore my own ideas through my work, queer ideas that I had been hesitant to embrace. It was the height of the AIDS epidemic and the culture wars in the United States. So, people were taking sides and I suppose it was inevitable that I would want to know where I stand in my life and work as an artist. I learned to defend myself in a critique and hold my own. That was valuable then and now.
That said, if I were to do it over again, I might have held out for state school to avoid the debt that I incurred. It took me nearly ten years to pay off the student loans. Today that is a drop in the bucket. I don’t know how students do it today.
Who are some of the people who were formative in the way that you think about ceramics and creating in general?
My influences are fairly eclectic, and range from Lucie Rie and Grayson Perry to Kiki Smith, and Philip Guston. All of the people who I am drawn to seem to have a haptic sense of their material and perhaps a peculiar sense of a story embedded in their work. I have to credit my teachers, especially the late Doug Baldwin, who brought a sense of humor to his work as a maker and educator. He made these wonderful little clay characters, which inhabited a world that came to life in his Claymation films and sculptural installations. He made his work with a sense of joy and humility. I learned allot from his example. I moved to New York City in 1992 and I was fortunate to walk into the Fawbush gallery in Soho where Kiki Smith’s seminal figurative sculptures first crawled, hung and splayed across the space. Her work was and continues to be a revelation to me. Her embrace of the narrative and her sense of material and touch is so compelling and continues to teach me something about making credible work that might resonate with another. But perhaps the first and most profound impression made upon me was in 1979, when on a school trip I walked into the Guggenheim Museum for the first time to see the Joseph Beuys retrospective. There was an intensity to the work, the sheer mass of blocks of lard, and felt covered everyday objects, scattered chalkboards with scrawled writing over their surfaces. It was utter chaos and it was fabulous! This exhibition was astonishing to me and I think I can fairly say it led me to think for the first time that art was a possibility for me.
Can you talk about the physical process of working with clay—are there motions you return to over and over, do you find that the physical action influences your mental state or vice versa?
Oh yeah. Absolutely. Working with clay for me is a whole-body experience. It begins when I prepare my clay. I position myself into a pugilist stance with one leg in front of the other, as I anchor of my feet, wedging, wrestling and forming the clay into a spiral mass, pressing the air out and getting a feel for the moisture in the mud. Is it too wet or too dry? Wedging is a great place for me to get in the zone. I have to be present in my body and restful in my mind to do the job well. It is a simple task in the scheme of things, but it is the beginning, and beginnings are important, they set the tone for what may come.
I feel like clay is such a special medium because it usually does hold huge emotional significance whether it be a grandmother’s bowl or a friend’s mug, etc. and I think I’m kind of interested in these relationships. Do you see that this level of the sentimental comes up in your work or process?
I understand the draw of the sentimental, the nostalgic. I see it in my grandmother’s Stangl plate that held my buttered toast for breakfast. I love the sense of touch and connection to the maker. Looking at or if you are lucky enough to hold a polychrome pot by Nampeyo, and feel the pinched clay on the interior of one of her seed jars, and realize that it was her hands that made that nearly one hundred years ago. To be touching what she touched, that is special. I suppose it is unavoidable given the role that this material has had in human history that it might have such an emotive quality. It seems ever present, this dirt from which we come. So yes, I do see a sense of nostalgia that I am keenly aware of in the ways that I think about my work in clay. But I also try to avoid the fetishization of clay that seems to be a circular trap particular to craft and material based making that places ceramists into a particular kind of ghetto, separate from art or design, distinctions that serve commercial interests than cultural ones.
I’m really fascinated by the very act of working with one’s hands, it’s so personal.
Can you talk a little bit about your relationship with your own hands?
What a great and peculiar question. My hands are long and wide, with broad spade like palms. I am tall, and my hands are an extension of that largess. I can always tell when I am not throwing pots because my calluses start to appear from working with all the other things I make and do. Their absence remind me to throw more pots.
Do you find that clay has a connection to the past, and are you conscious of it in your work? How has your own history come to life in your work?
I often begin with a story, a historical reference, a fiction that allows me to develop an idea through the material. These fictions might be allegorical in some way, or they might be autobiographical.
I examine my own life, memory and other histories in search of quirks and queer characters, events and places as a way to start a new project. Often the “back story” behind my work is not entirely apparent to the viewer, but the forms that emerge are intuitive responses to these stories. For example, I am currently creating a series of ceramic figures and objects that are about people who I greatly admire like the poets Federico García Lorca and Audre Lorde, among others, These figures of courageous and queer characters I admire are formed with slabs, pulled across a wood table like pizza dough, and then composed into a modeled composition. In a literal sense the clay holds the memory of its form, and metaphorically the form attempts to allude to a memory, a fragment, a phrase, a gesture and abstraction of an idea.
What is your work process like, from inception to execution? How long does a project usually take from start to finish? Has the way you approach a new project evolved over time?
I work in two ways typically. Sometimes I work intuitively, on the fly, responding to an idea, a turn of phrase and transform that into a form, often in a collage like approach to piecing fragments and slabs of clay, pulled, pressed and slumped into a form, or cast forms slipped and stuck into place. These types of works often lead me through a visual problem and help me to develop a new vocabulary. It is a refreshing release from the other way that I work, which is much slower and will unfold over the course of years, typically two or three years in most cases. This type of project might begin with intensive drawing, a daily practice that I have employed in my studio since I was a student. These observational and conceptual drawings are compiled along with readings and material and field research. For example, I might fix my attention on some person, place or thing and then research deeply into its history as a way to generate images and forms. Currently I have been working on a series of images and ceramic sculptures based on research about the “Talking Statues” of Rome, a peculiar gathering place for Romans since the fifteenth century; who have used the statue called Pasquino to wheat paste their political complaints and gossip upon. It was and continues to be a focal point for the populace to vocalize and visualize their dissatisfactions with the powers that be. It has led me to create one thousand drawings, as a precursor to a series of prints and sculptures that invariably will lead to a series of larger ceramic sculptures with wheat pasted images covering parts of the surface. This type of project, it is slow, and during the process there are twists and turns that reveal new avenues to explore. And, yes this process evolves over time and perhaps if you ask me this question again in the future I will be working in a different way. But for now, this seems to be what works for me.
Can you describe your personal ceramic practice? What are some of the benefits or drawbacks of your chosen material?
I am a bit of a pack rat, and I love tools, and materials. I guess my personal ceramic practice is one in which I am always game for trying a new tool, technique or way of making. I think ceramists have this impulse for being tool makers and problem solvers. That is something I greatly enjoy. But it also can easily send me down a rabbit hole chasing a particular glaze effect, or what have you. I suppose it is this curiosity about the materials I work with that can give me an advantage and it also can get me into trouble. A few years ago, I was down in Haiti helping to build a community ceramics studio in Port-au-Prince. A local potter had the most wonderful clay, a yellow ochre colored earthenware she had dug out of a river bed in the country side. I was curious to see how the ochre would fire with a glaze I was working with and she offered some clay for me to take back to Brooklyn. Little did I know that my curiosity would alarm the airport security who hauled me out onto the tarmac at the airport upon my departure. They thought I had plastic explosives! After having to unpack my bag, and dig my hands into the clay, I explained in my rather feeble French that I was a ceramist working with Haitian potters and it was local clay I was going to test, they rolled their eyes and said something about ridiculous Americans and told me to get back on the airplane. That ochre colored clay fired to the most beautiful deep walnut brown. I wish I had more of it!
What are some of the challenges that working in ceramics presents, or to put it differently, what are some of the limitations of the form and/or idea of ceramics?
I think there are several factors that might be viewed as limitations to ceramics in form and concept. One of them is the sheer knowledge required to make the material do what I intended it to do. Pesky gravity, and chemistry gets in the way all the time. The other challenge is the weird historical burden of this material. Clay has a comforting nostalgia and simultaneously an intellectually claustrophobic legacy of its craft. It’s a perception thing, “craft”. It is reassuring to be “in” the tribe of makers who share and covet craft knowledge, and it is also a bit of a hindrance in that there is a suspicion that “craft” is not really credible in the capital A art world, especially in the United States where we have a fetishization of youth, inexperience and amateurism which for whatever reason is equated with being innovative and authentic. I think that is changing as ceramic materials are more readily accepted and used by artists of every stripe but there is an unfortunate mischaracterization that the crafts are simply the “hands” and artists or designers are the big ideas people. Hence the unfortunate rise in terms like “design thinking” and the proliferation of art programs that don’t teach students how to make things.
Who or what are some of your larger influences?
As I mentioned, my tastes are rather eclectic and range from graphic design, rock-n-roll, and a broad spectrum of ceramics, sculpture and painting. I suppose one artist who looms large in my mind is Robert Rauschenberg whose approach to his combines (assemblage like constructions), opened my eyes to the way that I might incorporate multiple media across all of my work. And his performance collaborations led me to look at music, theater and dance all of which influence the forms and rhythms I am drawn to. That segue into performance led me to look at Mike Kelley’s videos and sculpture, the punk- ballet choreography of Michael Clarke, the production design and theatrical direction of Robert Wilson, and the material drama of Kiki Smith’s sculpture. All of these are influences that I might point to in my work.
What’s a typical day like for you?
I wake up and have coffee with my husband Siggy. Scrubbed and caffeinated, I take our dog Remy for a walk and if I am not teaching, we continue our walk to my studio which is just down the road in an old knitting factory in Bushwick, Brooklyn. Most days I can be found there. The studio routine is based on whatever I am working on at that moment. But I will typically prepare my clay while a fresh pot of coffee is brewing and Remy is getting comfortable on his bed next to my work table. I wedge and he snores. With a second cup of coffee, I settle into a bit of writing, sometimes just a task list and most days a bit of random thoughts on a page to clear the cob webs and clarify some ideas I am working through. Then I spend some time drawing. At the moment I am working through a series of one thousand small tin glazed ceramic sculptures so each day will invariably transition into working on what is unfolding before me. I’ll break for lunch around one o’clock if I remember to eat. Usually Remy will remind me and we go out for a walk and grab a bite to eat and then back into the studio until the sun sets then home for dinner.
Do you find yourself interacting with social media, and do you find that your work has a relationship to it? How does something so physical interact with something so virtual? Do you see the possibility for any relationship between the two?
I have mixed feelings about social media. I like the ability to make connections to other makers online. I do use it to share work in progress, or a pastiche of things I am looking at, or listening to. But I find the whole thing to be a terrific distraction when I am working in the studio. I try to turn my phone off when I am working, unless I am expecting someone.
Your question, how something so physical interacts with something so virtual is an excellent one to consider. I have started to create short videos that move around a work in progress or show details that can’t be seen in a still shot, and invariably I will incorporate a snippet of recorded sound, it might be a bit of music, or more likely a recording of spoken word, a poem, a conversation. I like the fragmentary nature of these videos and it provides another way into my work. I see these strange digital moments as extensions of my work. They are elusive and ephemeral and let others see behind the curtain (sort of).
Do you find that your physical surroundings, or emotional surroundings, influence your work? You seem to have worked in a variety of stunning but very different locations!
Yes, place is a big part of how I work and what I invariably am looking at. I try to travel as much as I can. And in my travels, I am looking for histories, stories, and visual cues that might spark something new to introduce into my visual vocabulary. I think places resonate with an emotional history that ask us to pay attention to them. I spent some time visiting the Alhambra, a palace located in Granada, Andalusia, Spain. The whole complex and the surrounding city are a confluence of cultures intermingling and conflicting and informed much of what I was drawing, reading and looking at. It led me to read and appreciate the writing of Federico García Lorca and his writing in turn led me to create a series of sculptures exploring a legacy of queer artists who disappear amidst the whitewash of heteronormative historical memory.
The word ‘ceramics’ has such a wide reach and so many definitions. Can you talk about what defines ceramics, to you personally?
The term ceramics triggers all sorts of associations. I suppose for me there is a comfort that I find in the term, because I spent the better part of my youth working in a pottery and surrounded by craftspeople who took me under their wing and taught me their craft. The term implies a sense of community.
Ceramics also offers a way of looking through material, across cultures to find the connections that we share. I am fascinated by the history of ceramics, because it traces the history of humanity in such interesting ways. For example, consider the Stangl pottery that my grandmother fed her family with at each meal. The glaze on that pottery was based on majolica glazes used by Italian ceramists in the 15th century. The Italian ceramists very likely were influenced by tin-glazed ceramics being traded across the Mediterranean originating from Al-Andalus, or Moorish Spain. Like now, it is plausible that ceramists across the ages shared recipes, ideas and methods. It would explain why the same glazes and methods show up across the ages and cultures around the globe. These glazes were most likely adopted and adapted by artisans traveling with the Islamic caliphate that spread across north Africa and into the Iberian Peninsula. Historians can trace these glazes through Egypt, Syria, and into Persia. Some theories speculate that this type of white glaze with over glaze decorations may have been an aesthetic and commercial response by Persian ceramists in about 800 ACE who were competing with the influx of blue and white Chinese porcelain. All this history connected through a simple painted plate made in mid-twentieth century New Jersey. Ceramics…
You wrote that you are “concerned with representations of the queer and peculiar.” Could you expand upon that?
I remember I was in an art history class, and an image of Donatello’s David appeared on the screen in the dark lecture hall. The sculpture shows a young nude David, holding a sword, wearing a floral hat and straddling the decapitated head of the Philistine Goliath. The work is really spectacular, a classic work of Renaissance sculpture. The professor looking up from his yellow note pad gave us the run down on the work, and added with a bit of contempt in his voice, that the contrapposto position of the body was revelatory of form “…as well as Donatello’s homosexuality. I mean look at those hips. Tsk.” He said it with such bile in his voice, and I thought to myself, fuck you. Of course, there was no mention of the Donatello’s sexuality in the history book we were asked to read. And the only mention of it was from the thin lips of someone who seemed utterly disgusted by it. I am a gay man living in the United States of America. I grew up and came out at the height of the AIDS epidemic. I have seen how easily it is to be vilified and have your rights taken away. I am seeing the potential for that to happen right now in this country. I am painfully aware of some people’s desire to erase my presence and the record of any contributions to culture, history, science, and civic life by those who are, like me, queer. My concern for representations of the queer and peculiar come out of my lived experiences as a gay man and my desire to make visible the lives of queer people. I’d like to see those histories revised to make visible, the men, and women and trans-people who have helped to make this world too.
You also said that you “respond to materials intuitively and embrace an interdisciplinary approach to art making with a particular interest in bridging art, design and craft as a vehicle for narrative.” I found this fascinating and seemed almost like the work of a historian or architect, using the means to achieve the goal. Could you talk a little bit about using different disciplines in your work and the way that they relate to each other? Would it be fair to say that you’re multi-disciplinary?
Yes, it is fair to say that I am a multi-disciplinary artist. My formative training in ceramics set the stage for me to explore collaborations with other makers across disciplines. Working in craft communities seems to encourage that sort of thing. I am fascinated by history and imagining revisionist histories, so it is understandable that you would see traces of that in some of my projects.
I worked for a time as a “user experience” designer and creative director in digital branding and advertising. It was a way to pay off my student loans and buy my first wheel and kiln. This foray into the world of commercial design opened up a new way of thinking about working. The work, like that of a craft community, is team oriented, and it led me to appreciate the contributions of other disciplines to the development of a creative endeavor. As my time in that world concluded (I was burning out on seventy-hour work weeks), I was working on a new project in my studio and I thought I might employ a design method as a new way for me to generate ideas and forms for my art work. So, I developed a series of “design personae.” This tool is essentially an imaginary character with defined needs and desires. They might even have a back story. Personae are typically used by industrial designers to assist them in the design of a product that meets the personae needs. I thought it would be interesting to create a persona based on a queer revolutionary and then make art and artifacts for that persona. The character descriptions were shared with a group of invited collaborators, Tony a bespoke tailor from Panama; Michael Chiabaudo a fashion photographer from Hollywood; Matt Lawrence a DJ in New York; Alva Cal y Mayor, a curator from Mexico; and Sigfrido Holguin, a fashion designer from the Dominican Republic. Working with each of these people we created garments, and ceramics, sculpture, images, and musical mixes, each of them specific to the needs of two imagined queer revolutionaries. The curator then worked with me to create a fake historical society that housed all of the art works each of which were presented as artifacts having some relationship to a queer American revolutionary named Fred and a Dominican guerrilla fighter named Isabella. This way of working opened up a new approach for me that continues to this day.
What is your relationship to memory, and in what way do you examine it in your work? You said that you find yourself “creating disobedient objects including prints and ceramics that help me to understand historical memory and to find a place in it for voices that might otherwise be silenced,” which is such a beautiful way to think about it.
Memory is a slippery thing. It depends upon who is doing the remembering and who is remembered. I have come to look at many of my sculptures as artifacts or props that when seen in the aggregate connect to reveal fragments of a story. My relationship to memory in that sense is conveyed through these fragments. I’d like to think that each of the images and objects that I make might stand on their own but when pieced together they may act as a rebus and reveal a secret.
Memory leads me to history, which it appears you have a huge interest in and work with a lot, but history also leads me to think about erasure, and I was wondering how you address that in your work? You mentioned that “growing up in a culture where to be gay is anathema, I was hungry for reflections of people like myself. So, I make queer little objects, and collections of artifacts; leaving traces of lives that might break through the silence of history and cultural erasure.” Could you talk about that a little bit more?
When my mother sold her home, she gave out some family heirlooms. I was given a drawing of a woman, a distant relative named Cousin Sadie. She was a spinster who lived alone on a small farmstead at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries in rural New Jersey. She was my grandfather’s distant cousin and some of my relatives had met her when they were children. According to the family, she pumped her own water from a well, chopped her own wood for her stove, and hunted and raised food to feed herself. A real family legend of self-reliance with a Protestant work ethic that any WASP would be proud of. I planned to reframe the drawing as the old one was cracked on the corner. When I pulled the pencil drawing out of the frame, I noticed on the back a small inscription, “with love Moira.” When I asked relatives who might remember, if they knew who Moira was, I was told that she was probably the lady that lived with Sadie. I asked if they were lesbian lovers. That line of inquiry was met with silence and then stone-faced denial. The quick end to the conversation made me wonder; would my husband and I make it past a generation or two in my own family tree? It seemed doubtful given the historical precedence. So, I set out to create a series of stories and traces of queer ancestors, reimagining the histories of spinsters and bachelors as queer radicals. If I didn’t see myself reflected in my own family’s story, then how might I expect to see it reflected in the larger culture. The exploration of personae, and the creation of revisionist histories opened up a new way for me to consider the content of my work and to see history as malleable and memory as a medium to play with.
I also wanted to touch on the idea of performance and the relationship between complex performance or a production incorporating a wide spectrum of emotion, and your own work and process—am I off base to think there might be some sort of influence or relationship or even opinion there?
No, you’re not really off base. I suppose I think about my work in theatrical ways. I don’t see myself as a performer, in spite of having created sculptural objects as if they are props and staging some of my exhibitions as if there are actors waiting in the wings, but that sort of thing is part of the fun of the work for me. Creating this strange sense of anticipation for an action; presenting my ceramics along with hand sewn garments as if they were the property of characters who have just left the room and the objects as artifacts are left there as evidence of some moment in time. If anything, theatricality offers a sculptural way of thinking about living space. Sound, specifically spoken and sung words are a new element that has emerged in a project I did a few years ago that explored the life and death of Jean Paul Marat and his assassin Charlotte Corday. It was, like previous projects, a multi-disciplinary body of work that included ceramics, prints, garments, photography and a musical composition and collaboration with the jazz composer Brett Sroka. In it I was dressed in a corset and hand sewn gown, I held a ceramic dagger and sang the love song Bésame Mucho. While there was performance, the actual exhibition included all the artifacts and a recording of the song remixed into a Tibetan like chant. It created an eerie sort of space, laden with a bit of camp humor, and pollical commentary. The exhibition took place prior to the 2016 presidential election. Thinking back on it now, the exhibition seems prescient for its foreshadowing of political turmoil.
You also clearly draw quite a bit—what role does drawing play in your creative process and what role does it fulfill personally?
I draw every day. A little something here or there. I keep sketchbooks, and I carry one with me where ever I go. It’s a habit that has served me well. You never know when something interesting may appear in your line of vision. When I got out of graduate school I turned that daily practice into a game, and decided I would draw on the NYC subway in a sketchbook every time I rode the train. I would only use black felt tip pens, no pencils, and no erasing. I had to live with the marks as they came down on the page. And I would only draw people or things that were in front of me. No judgments, just draw. I would only draw a subject during the time it took me to ride between a set number of stations (usually 2-3 stops, because you never knew when the subject would get up and walk away). Doing this for a number of years forced me to draw in a different way. It helped me to see and value my hand, and the way I render as something that has its own character. I still draw every day. The past year and a half, I have been working on a project that has mined thirty years of sketchbooks and combined one thousand drawings into a series of silkscreen prints. I am currently exploring line drawing over the surfaces of one thousand majolica glazed ceramic sculptures. The line quality over tin-glazed ceramic feels different than ink of course, it is closer to working with gouache paints, which are flat and have the potential for a graphic line or stippled effect. Unlike traditional glazes, the majolica over glazes are stiff and don’t melt or run as much in the kiln.
You mentioned fictional characters, and I was hoping you could elaborate on one and their presence in your work or process.
The characters I work with are usually done in pairs, often as a way to explore contrast and opposition. Currently I am working with two new characters exploring ideological and political opposites: Felix (a Fascist) and Abraham (an Anarcho-Syndicalist). The two characters allow me to get out of my own skin and look at perhaps the socio-political turmoil in our culture these days. The characters might play a big roll or they may just be in the background, like a sort of device used along the way to making things. As the project unfolds the characters will take their places. At the moment they are both just a series of photographs and garments and a collection of drawings. The individual characters are literally a means to an end for me. Like a design persona, they allow me to anticipate the needs of that character, their desires, the forms that these things might take and as a result a collection of images and sculptural artifacts emerge as their story unfolds.
Do you have any projects, shows or residencies coming up?
There is an upcoming exhibition of prints and drawings at the Equity Gallery opening Thursday, March 21, 2019 from 6 – 8pm, and the show continues to April 13. 245 Broome St., NY NY 10002 www.nyartistsequity.org
The exhibition, Queer and Peculiar Craft presents an intersectional group of artists each of whom have an uncanny visual language composed of cast-off histories and unexpected applications of craft materials. Koren Christofides, Greg Climer, Roxanne Jackson, Brian Kenny, Edmund Green Langdell, Phoenix Lindsey-Hall, Vick Quezada, Andrew Cornell Robinson, Timo Rissanen, Juana Valdes, and Lu Zhang.
Many of the liberating impulses since 1968 have led to significant changes in the way our society defines itself. There is now a much greater consciousness of the world’s multiculturalism and an understanding that not every person aspires to a utopian modernist model of progress that the West once believed to be an unquestioned absolute. A contemporary outgrowth of this shift is evidenced in the revival of craft materials and the ways that the crafts have opened up from material centered disciplines to idea infused functional, aesthetic, and conceptual creative strategies. The makers in this exhibition employ strategies in order to give voice to their search for personal and cultural identity in contrast to imposed standards of normalcy, which often deprive people of affirmative images so that they may not see themselves as actors in their own biography and society. Yet when these new voices, and visual languages push the boundaries of an accepted norm, they are seen as other, as strange, queer and peculiar.
According to the historian David J. Getsy, to nominate something as “queer” is to cast aspersion on it as being unnatural, incorrect, wrong, or abnormal. Anything called “queer” is looked at with suspicion and intensified scrutiny... As the most visible and mobile manifestation of the policing of the boundaries of the “normal,” the “natural,” and “common” sense, the label “queer” was historically used to tyrannize those who loved, desired, or lived differently. When lesbian, gay, and bisexual activists and thinkers rejected the presumption that they should assimilate and aspire to be merely tolerated, they embraced “queer” as a rallying cry. They upheld as a virtue their failure to fit into the normal. While the label “queer” is often associated with people who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans and/or gender non conforming, the concept in the context of the makers featured in this exhibition is intersectional in that they explore a multitude of identities, ideas and craft traditions by creating works that may appear peculiar looking, feeling or functioning in their explorations of craft materials as well as topics that range from feminism, gender identity, queer visibility, ethnicity, immigration, sexuality, history, and politics.
The implication of queer peculiarity applied to the construction of otherness offers a simultaneous burden and an opportunity for each of these artists who come to their work with unique lived experiences and perspectives. The immigrant experience offers one way of seeing society through the lens of belonging or not. Juana Valdes explores her lived experiences and observations about migration as a complex process, constructing history through a continuum that involves the personal journey of the Afro-Cuban diasporic community into a new homeland. Her work examines craft materials and methods and in several of her works, she traces the post-colonial history of the Americas and the intercontinental trade in people and porcelain. Lu Zhang is an artist, born in Xian, China, who lives and works in New York. Her ceramic constructions of computers and tablets explore her sense of living between cultures. The roughly modeled ceramic rendering of video chats with her family in China reflect the experience of being in two cultures at once, but not quite fitting into either.
Artists Koren Christofides, and Roxanne Jackson explore ideas of female power with a sense of humor and fantastic forms modeled and manipulated out of clay and other media. Their creative explorations often touch upon human nature as seen through the lens of magic, mythology, and proverbs about women.
Greg Climer’s series of quilts inverts the traditional methods for quilt construction by creating the fabric fragments rather than upcycling scraps. He has been working with digital tools to compose larger abstractions of intimate, poignant and sometimes transgressive portraits of queer people. Fashion designer Edmund Green Langdell is creating a platform that seeks to uplift the health and wellbeing of transgender people through the creation of hand made crochet or needle felted packers designed to affirm the silhouette in apparel for transgedner people. Brian Kenny’s multidisciplinary works explore autobiographical themes of his queer identity, shifting societal perceptions about gender, sexuality and politics. His banners are composed of a patchwork of sports jerseys and vinyl advertisements pieced together to celebrate exuberant expressions of the masculine queer gaze. Timo Rissanen explores craft through cross-stiched poetry, and memory resulting in works that reflect upon his lived experiences of discrimination as a gay man as well as celebrations of desire and reflections upon the objectified body.
Vick Quezada’s projects explore the material histories and consciousness of Indigenous- Latinx hybridity within Western culture. They use a variety of media, and performances embodying ancient Nahuan rites to simultaneously make the obscured visible. Their work in this exhibition uses smoke-fired terracotta to create a series of prison cafeteria trays, reflecting upon the humble platform for countless shared meals of millions of imprisoned people. Their artifacts, delineate inherent systems of power and subjectivity in the Americas, while transgressing “official” historical accounts.
Most queer people face the daily challenge of being their authentic self in societies that often are indifferent or openly hostile to them. In response to notions of visibility Andrew Cornell Robinson’s ceramic and mixed media sculptures explore historical customs as a metaphor for queer-baiting and conformity. His Jamon Jamon series is inspired by the medieval Spanish tradition of offering ham to house guests. This customary form of hospitality may seem commonplace today, but its historical roots come from a desire to sniff out heresy during the inquisition when the pious were looking for expressions of distaste in response to the offer of sliced pork. His use of butchered cuts of ham serve as a metaphor about being “suspected”, and “queer-baited” as a gay man. The sculptures are modeled, cast, and camouflaged with inlaid surface glazes, printed images and hidden messages.
Phoenix Lindsey-Hall’s work centers around violence, loss and memory. Phoenix uses porcelain and stoneware to create sculptures that are based on extensive historical research about violence, hate crimes, and queer histories. Her unique explorations of events and artifacts focus on members of queer communities. Some examples include her porcelain casts of weapons used in hate-crimes, and others include artifacts that serve as evidence of queer lives lived. “I have discovered that the everyday objects that are left behind create an instant memorial.” The works included in this queer and peculiar exhibition ask how we might imagine, make, live and see differently.
The Clemente Abrazo Interno Gallery 107 Suffolk Street, New York, NY 10002. www.theclementecenter.org Dec 5, 2019 through Jan 18, 2020. On view Wed - Sun 12-7pm.
For more info contact firstname.lastname@example.org
Queer + Peculiar Craft is curated by Fred Frelinghuysen Presents and Andrew C. Robinson. Support for this exhibition is provided by The Clemente, and the Arts + Crafts Research Studio.
Queer and Peculiar Craft showcases an inter-sectional group of artists who explore craft to transgress expectations of traditional materials, methods, and meaning. Artists included in this exhibition each have an uncanny ability to find their voice by expanding the boundaries of cultural traditions. Their craft strategies expand techniques with long histories, such as pottery, quilting, cross stitching, needle felting, crochet, and printmaking, among other media.
These makers explore how making and meaning provide unique perspectives on queer aesthetics, feminism, and explorations of identity in relationship to place, culture and history.
Artists: Koren Christofides, Greg Climer, Roxanne Jackson, Brian Kenny, Edmund Langdell, Phoenix Lindsey-Hall, Vick Quezada, Timo Rissanen, Andrew Cornell Robinson, Juana Valdes, and Lu Zhang.
The Clemente Abrazo Interno Gallery 107 Suffolk Street, New York, NY 10002. www.theclementecenter.org Dec 5, 2019 through Jan 18, 2020. On view Wed - Sun 12-7pm.
For more info contact email@example.com
Queer + Peculiar Craft is curated by Fred Frelinghuysen Presents and Andrew C. Robinson. Support for this exhibition is provided by The Clemente, and the Arts + Crafts Research Studio.
It Could Be You Andrew Cornell Robinson's work is included in the portraiture exhibition in at Equity Gallery. Lodrys, 2019, Graphite Work on Paper, 27 5/8 x 21 7/16 inches (70 x 55 centimeters); Framed 28 11/16 x 22 11/16 inches (73 x 63 centimeters).
Equity Gallery is pleased to present It Could Be You: Portraiture in a Constructed World, a comprehensive group exhibition of contemporary portraiture curated by Hyeseung Marriage-Song, Beverly McNeil, and Patricia Watwood.
The show features a diverse group of international multidisciplinary artists whose artwork explores both the purpose and limits of portraiture, identity, and the self in the modern digital age.
Somewhere between the introduction of cheap camcorders and the proliferation of smart phones we became distrustful of our body’s ability to mediate directly with the physical world. To a large extent we have exchanged the sensual perceptions emanating from our surroundings for simulated experiences that mitigate reality through camera lenses and digitalized imagery. Once understood to be aide-mémoirs of life’s lived experiences, the media is reality—a reality comprising instantly sharable content validated or refuted by social media emojis.
That’s a risky way to construct one’s universe. How can we hope to fix an identity, let alone one informed by ethical principles on a mutating digital stage that is subject to the whims of marketing algorithms and bots on a mission? Given present conditions, it’s no wonder that our instinct to ascertain “what’s real” has devolved into an addicting stalk for pleasure hits that never quite satiate an appetite weaned on spectacle.
That said, can we stake out what is abiding, true and stable about us and our fellows? In an increasingly alarming and chaotic era, art that depicts what is actually there and recognizable is defiant---and nothing could be more necessary and reassuring at the moment than simply showing what we actually look like (and mean) to each other.
Artists include: Jamie Adams, Fielding Archer, Kelly Birkenruth, Tyler Bohm, Trudy Borenstein-Sugiura, Ryan , rown, Maya Ciarrocchi, Patricia Fabricant, Brooks Frederick, Judith Gresh, Cornelia Hernes, Amy Hill, Natalie Italiano, Young Min Koh, Pia Ledy, Liz Lindstrom, Daniel Maidman, Hyeseung Marriage-Song, Miguel Malagon, Allison Maletz, Juliet Martin, Traci Wright Martin, Gregory Mortensen, Mary Morvant, Gilbert Oh, Linnea Paskow, Leah Poller, Andrew C. Robinson, Mario Robinson, Toni Silber-Delerive, Burton Silverman, Matt Talbert, Jesse Thompson, Alexandra Tyng, Yuqi Wang, Patricia Watwood, Lindsey Wolkowicz.
Curated by Hyeseung Marriage-Song, Beverly McNeil, and Patricia Watwood.
November 14th— December 7th 2019 Opening Reception: Thursday, November 14th, 2019, 6 PM-8 PM
Equity Gallery, 245 Broome Street, New York, NY 10002 Open Wednesday - Friday, 11 AM -6 PM and Saturday - Sunday, 12 PM -6 PM www.nyartistsequity.org
Andrew Cornell Robinson and Matt Rota, curated by Michael Gormley
March 21st - April 13th, 2019 Opening Reception: Thursday, March 21st, 6 PM-8 PM
Equity Gallery 245 Broome Street, New York, NY 10002 Gallery Hours: Wednesday - Friday, 1-7 PM and Saturday, 12-6 PM
Equity Gallery is pleased to present Hard-Line, a two person exhibition curated by Michael Gormley featuring the artwork of Andrew Cornell Robinson and Matt Rota. By its very nature, the line is considered to be a building block of art-making. It is used as the first step in planning a creative endeavor, the structural scaffolding upon which the artist further builds. However, Robinson and Rota look past this view, realizing the full potential of the line, and allowing it to play a predominant role within their artwork. These two distinctly different artists share a creative implementation of graphic line-work. In their works, lines become an effective and powerful tool for a complex yet straightforward, efficient visual communication and narrative. They utilize the naturally sturdy and rigorous nature of the line, making it a driving force within their art. Through these graphic techniques, their artworks possess a blunt, unwavering immediacy, managing to impart hard-hitting topically relevant subject matters while still retaining an emotionally resonant candor.
The prints and drawings of Robinson are inspired by a visit to Talking Sculptures of Rome, also known as The Congregation of Wits, specific ancient sculptures that were appropriated by the Roman community to serve as a physical repository for public postings, ranging from prayers, to poems, to political manifestos. Robinson takes the spirit of this aggregation of classical art, agitprop, and crude graffiti and applies it to his latest body of work. Robinson gathered 1,000 of his rough, exploratory sketches and compiled them into a series of prints. These adapted drawings fluctuate stylistically and thematically. While some of the subjects are delicately rendered with thin, clean narrow lines, and retain a sense of naturalism, others are bold, sketchy, and extremely gestural, sometimes imparting only the bare essence of what the drawing is representing. The wildly varying styles of draughtsmanship lend themselves well to the dizzying spectrum of subjects that Robinson depicts in his artwork. Nude figures, foodstuffs, modernist furniture, household items, fashion, masks, public figures, and tyrants of the past and present are deftly combined, creating a free association based bricolage that maintains a cohesive yet uneasy cultural narrative. At times, he combines short phrases written in a wide array of fonts, jumbled together. By juxtaposing the lettering against the printed sketches, the text is broken down into its essential elements, revealing just the lines themselves, but still retaining a hint of their original meaning. While mostly monochromatic, color is sometimes introduced in abstracted swaths and layered on in a manner similar to newspaper halftone printing. This serves to further highlight the more formalistic components of the line-work while heightening the hectic nature of the compositions. Through his emphasis on expressive lines and clashing thematic and formalistic rendering, Robinson captures the riotous zeitgeist of popular and political unrest and distills disparate components into an unwieldy and simultaneously succinct form.
While Robinson uses the rough, bare-boned nature of line-work to evoke the wider atmosphere of the contemporary epoch, Rota’s body of work is more particular. Rota turns his focus to precise moments and instances of contemporary political upheavals, injustices, and catastrophes. Often taking inspiration from the constant deluge of news in the digital age, he refines the cacophony of information into unique, pinpointed narrative scenes while embodying the bigger picture. Recently, Rota’s focus has turned to the ever-increasing cataclysmic ecological and human toll resulting from global warming. He composes scenes mimicking the vantage point of satellite images, allowing the audience to survey the crafted locations from an almost omnipotent, god-like perspective. Rota’s drawings are presented in stark black and white, making the detailed, vivid line-work all the more present and visible. Settings of blasted, scorched earth, weather-battered abandoned buildings, increasingly crowded and shrinking enclaves of human inhabitation, and encroaching ominous expanses of water are all meticulously executed. Strokes of ink are bundled and cross-hatched to create thick, dramatic shadows and claustrophobic spaces, or sparingly utilized in small, yet highly kinetic tufts to impart crushing, expanding vastness and dread. This alternation between heavy, granular detail and scarce, negative spaces serves to heighten the weighty ambience of anxiety about the precarious current state of the world. These painstakingly intricate depictions signify a relatable, human story full of pathos, while being a dire warning about the scope and gravity of environmental trauma.
Robinson and Rota use the concise essence of drawing and linework to convey larger messages about the complicated, unstable, and politically restless present. The lines’ versatility and uncanny ability to relay scale, feeling, tension, and information in a elegantly candid way causes both artists’ works to have a clear intellectual and emotional impact on their audience.
Hard-Line will be on view at Equity Gallery from March 21st to April 13th, 2019.
About the Artists
Andrew Cornell Robinson (b. 1968 Camden, NJ) is a contemporary artist who creates sculptural assemblages comprised of ceramic and mixed media juxtaposed with expressive prints and paintings that coalesce in works alluding to myth, ritual and memory.
He studied ceramic sculpture at the Glasgow School of Art, Scotland, and the Maryland Institute College of Art where he received a BFA. He was awarded an MFA from the School of Visual Arts, where he became interested with the intersection of memory, identity, politics and power.
He has been featured in many publications including Sculpture and Maake magazines, Huffington Post, Hyperallergic, Gay City News, Art Info, etc. His work was featured in “Correspondence between NYC & P-au-P,” a publication about the dialogue between artists from Haiti and New York City. He has participated in curatorial and research projects and was a participating artist in Debtfair a project in the Whitney Biennial. Robinson received an Edward F. Albee fellowship residency. He was a visiting artist with Urban Zen, in Port-au-Prince, Haiti and a resident artist at the Agastya Foundation, in Bangalore, India. He is also the recipient of an Urban Glass Merit Scholarship. He is a member of the faculty at Parsons School of Design, and Greenwich House Pottery. Robinson lives and works in New York City.
Matt Rota is an illustrator, educator and author. He studied fine arts at the Maryland Institute College of Art, and illustration at the School of Visual Arts. His clients include The New York Times, Der Spiegel, Politico, Foreign Policy, The Washington Post, The New Republic, The Marshall Project, ProPublica, The Columbia Journalism Review, The Center for Investigative Journalism, Zeit, and The Guardian, amongst others. He is an instructor at The School of Visual Arts, and the Maryland Institute, College of Art. His drawings and prints have been exhibited internationally. He is the author of two books on drawing from Rockport Press, The Art of Ballpoint, and Pencil Arts Workshop.